Skip to content
AI ConnectPowered by VELENTIS
AI-generated2 min

Lünendonk Study on Agentic AI: 80 Percent of Enterprises Remain Stuck in Pilot Stage

While 96 percent of DACH enterprises expect efficiency gains from autonomous AI agents, 80 percent remain stuck in pilot phases, a study by Lünendonk and its partners reveals.

This article was AI-generated and published automatically. Context, labelling and all sources at the end of the article.

(KI-generiertes Symbolbild: Gemini / AI Connect)

The transition from assistive AI copilots to self-directed software agents is widely considered the next major paradigm shift in enterprise IT. However, an empirical study released by market research firm Lünendonk and Hossenfelder demonstrates a stark discrepancy between executive ambitions and operational reality across Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. While corporate leaders overwhelmingly anticipate significant efficiency and cost benefits, almost no organization has managed to transition autonomous agents into comprehensive production environments.

Published on September 17, 2026, the study titled "Agentic AI: vom Copiloten zum Autopiloten" was conducted in cooperation with Cosmo Consult, Materna, HyPlus, Reply, Sopra Steria, and Woodmark. The authors surveyed 180 chief information officers, IT heads, and business department leaders across the DACH region. The strategic appetite for automation is virtually unanimous: 96 percent of respondents confirmed that they expect tangible cost reductions and process acceleration from deploying agentic artificial intelligence.

Despite this high enthusiasm, the research uncovers a pronounced deployment bottleneck. A total of 80 percent of surveyed enterprises remain stranded in exploratory or testing phases. Specifically, 58 percent are running limited pilot projects, while another 18 percent are conducting isolated test runs without direct operational ties. Only 19 percent of companies currently utilize autonomous agents in productive environments, and even those deployments remain confined to narrowly defined operational niches.

The shortfall is particularly acute when examining holistic process execution. Just one percent of businesses across the DACH region have achieved full end-to-end integration of AI agents across their core enterprise workflows. The overwhelming majority of proof-of-concept projects collapse before reaching general availability. The primary cause of this attrition is not the AI model capability itself, but the fragmented corporate systems and legacy software stacks that prevent reliable system-level execution.

The single greatest roadblock identified in the report is inadequate data infrastructure. IT organizations report that between 60 and 80 percent of their total project expenditure and workforce hours must be spent cleaning up, structuring, and interconnecting enterprise data silos. Autonomous agents require dependable, low-latency access to accurate corporate knowledge to execute multi-step workflows. Without this foundation, agentic models produce errors or stall, prompting IT leaders to halt live rollout plans.

These findings indicate that the road to autonomous enterprise software demands far more groundwork than initially projected. Organizations looking to capitalize on agentic automation must treat data engineering and governance as mandatory prerequisites rather than secondary considerations. Until internal data architectures are modernized and connected, the vision of an autonomous, autopilot-driven enterprise will remain confined to laboratory experiments for 99 percent of regional businesses.

What this means for you

For IT decision-makers, the findings show that deploying AI agents successfully is not an off-the-shelf software procurement challenge, but primarily a data architecture overhaul. Budget planners must allocate the vast majority of resources toward cleaning and connecting internal data silos, or risk seeing their pilot projects stall before ever reaching production.

Perspectives

Coverage: 2× EU · 2× Other

One story, several angles: how each source frames the topic, each with a verbatim quote.

  • hyplus-group.comOther

    HyPlus highlights its partnership in the study and emphasizes that successfully scaling from pilots to production requires the right technological and data foundation.

    Original quote

    „what is still holding them back from moving from pilot projects to full-scale production.“

    hyplus-group.com
  • woodmark.deEU

    Woodmark emphasizes that Agentic AI is becoming a central lever for business value, while over three quarters of companies remain stuck in the testing or pilot phase.

    Original quote

    „Über drei Viertel der Unternehmen befinden sich noch in der Test-, Explorations- oder Pilotphase.“

    woodmark.de
  • cosmoconsult.comOther

    COSMO CONSULT focuses on the core question of why agent projects get stuck in the pilot phase while promoting its own accompanying expert insights on building the data foundation.

    Original quote

    „Why Your AI Agents Are Stuck in the Pilot Phase“

    cosmoconsult.com
  • luenendonk.deEU

    Lünendonk frames the study as a guide for transitioning to autonomous systems, calling for operational resolve to move past the pilot phase into regular operations.

    Original quote

    „Unternehmen müssen den Übergang vom Piloten in den Regelbetrieb aktiv gestalten“

    luenendonk.de

Source classification is maintained editorially (political spectrum only where consensus is broad; vendor communication is PR, not journalism). Unlabelled sources are unclassified: we do not guess.

Evidence

Solidly sourced
62/100
  • Approximately 80 percent of enterprises in the DACH region remain in pilot, test, or exploration phases, while only 19 percent use agents selectively in production.

    single source
  • Just one percent of surveyed organizations have achieved end-to-end integration of AI agents across their core business processes.

    single source
  • Between 60 and 80 percent of total project effort in agentic AI initiatives is consumed by cleaning and connecting underlying data infrastructures.

    single source

The evidence score is computed, not hand-set: from confidence, the number of sources and the share of verified statements.

Source & transparency

As of: September 27, 2026

AI-generatedAI-generated: produced automatically from vetted sources with technical quality checks (source, quote and figure verification); no human sign-off of each item before publication

Sources
4
Verified statements
0 / 3
Evidence score
62Solidly sourced

Want to put this into practice?

We connect you with suitable AI providers from the DACH region, free of charge and without obligation.

What's next?