Skip to content
AI ConnectPowered by VELENTIS
AI-generated2 min

Horváth Study: US Industry Invests Nearly Five Times More in AI Than German Companies

A Horváth survey reveals a growing divide: US industrial firms invest 2.9 percent of revenue in AI, compared to 0.6 percent in Germany. Data prep bottlenecks further slow down practical execution.

This article was AI-generated and published automatically. Context, labelling and all sources at the end of the article.

(KI-generiertes Symbolbild: Gemini / AI Connect)

An international survey conducted by management consultancy Horváth among more than 1,000 executive board members reveals a widening divergence between major economic zones. While industrial enterprises in the United States dedicate an average of 2.9 percent of their total revenue to artificial intelligence initiatives, German manufacturers commit merely 0.6 percent. Despite widespread debate regarding industrial automation, the domestic manufacturing sector remains cautious: by 2027, German industrial firms plan to increase their spending by just 0.3 percentage points. Only the domestic service sector shows greater ambition, targeting 2.9 percent of revenue by 2027 to match US levels.

On the surface, capital deployment appears to be accelerating, as reflected in the Maturity Index released by enterprise software firm ServiceNow on 9 September 2026. Average AI expenditures by German companies rose by 118 percent year over year, slightly outpacing the global growth rate of 110 percent. However, the study identifies a sharp contrast between strategic intent and day-to-day execution. While German corporate leadership scored 59 out of 100 points in vision and governance, operational integration into actual AI-supported workflows dropped to a modest 41 points.

A concrete explanation for this implementation lag emerges from research published by software provider Akeneo on 15 September 2026. Preparatory data tasks absorb vast operational resources: German enterprises allocate an average of 49.7 percent of their entire AI project budgets simply to cleaning, structuring, and preparing datasets for algorithmic processing. By comparison, the international average stands at 36 percent. IT decision-makers directly point to this heavy preparatory burden as the primary bottleneck delaying measurable productivity gains in core operations.

This combination of low relative capital allocation in manufacturing and high manual overhead in data cleansing places significant strain on German enterprises. While US competitors leverage substantial front-end investments to test and deploy scalable automated workflows, many domestic manufacturing firms remain bogged down in consolidating legacy data silos. These necessary infrastructure efforts absorb financial and human capital that is subsequently missing during actual model deployment and workflow integration.

For Germany's export-driven manufacturing base, this structural gap poses tangible strategic challenges. While the service sector aims to reach parity with North American counterparts by 2027, the traditional manufacturing core risks falling further behind international rivals. If nearly half of all project resources remain tied to fundamental data preparation while relative budgets sit at a fraction of US investments, turning initial pilot projects into productive business outcomes will remain a steep hurdle.

What this means for you

For business leaders and IT strategists, these findings demonstrate that increasing AI spending without fixing underlying data architecture yields limited results. Companies must systematically clean and integrate their internal data sources before new software tools can deliver meaningful competitive advantages.

Evidence

Solidly sourced
62/100
  • The ServiceNow Maturity Index indicates 118 percent growth in German AI spending, yet German firms score only 41 out of 100 points for AI-supported workflows.

    single source
  • An Akeneo survey reveals that German companies spend 49.7 percent of total AI project effort on cleaning and preparing data, compared to an international average of 36 percent.

    single source

The evidence score is computed, not hand-set: from confidence, the number of sources and the share of verified statements.

Source & transparency

As of: September 16, 2026

AI-generatedAI-generated: produced automatically from vetted sources with technical quality checks (source, quote and figure verification); no human sign-off of each item before publication

Sources
3
Verified statements
0 / 2
Evidence score
62Solidly sourced

Want to put this into practice?

We connect you with suitable AI providers from the DACH region, free of charge and without obligation.

What's next?